Why problems like homelessness may be easier to solve than to manage – Malcolm Gladwell

The following text contains transcriptions, quotations, excerpts from an original source linked below.

We KNOW that it is cheaper to give a homeless person somewhere to live than to keep them on the street.

The problem of homelessness may be easier to solve than we often believe, and at a lower price. But there are other costs, and questions. The problem is concentrated in a very small number of people who are profoundly troubled. If these guys cost that much money just by living on the streets, it’s cheaper to take them off the street, give them an apartment and assign a full time caseworker to make sure they get back on their medication, back on their feet […]. They’re getting jobs. They’re paying their own rent. It’s possible, if you provide the right kind of context and give people some attention, we can save them.

SIMON: You certainly know, Mr. Gladwell, that the objection to this that some people have is political and even moral. Do you wind up concentrating a fantastic amount of resources on people who are chronic drug abusers or chronically drunk and ignoring the mother of three who is simply down on her luck?

GLADWELL: If you don’t do anything, they’ll cost you a hundred grand a year. If you do something, give them an apartment and a caseworker, they’ll cost you $25,000 year. We’re doing this not out of the kindness of our hearts necessarily. This is such a kind of bizarre social thing, but we’re doing this because we think we can save the City of New York and the City of Washington D.C. and the City of San Francisco millions of dollars a year, which we can use on other things. That’s why we’re doing it. That’s our first impulse. It’s cheaper.

To read the original posting, Click here.

Disclaimer: The companies and individuals mentioned on this website do not endorse the products that are sponsored or available for purchase on this website, nor are they affiliated with Resolving Poverty Inc. in any way.

Malcolm Gladwell’s February 13, 2006 article in The New Yorker, Million-Dollar Murray, follows a Reno, Nevada homeless man named Murray Barr.

SIMON: Let me get back though to the mother of three who’s down on her luck. Should we not feel morally uncomfortable about not coming up with a solution for her?

GLADWELL: Yes. I think you’re absolutely right. The thing that’s driving this strategy towards homelessness is the notion that we have a very limited amount of money, a very limited amount of political will. And what are we going to do with that? Well, we’re going to concentrate it on the worst part of the problem in the place where we can save the most money in the short term. That does not mean that we should ignore everybody else. But that’s a separate argument, really. I mean what we’re trying to show here is, can we, in a relatively short period of time, strike at the core of the problem? And if we can show that we can do that, then I would hope, I would hope that we would then take a step back and say, okay, let’s start dealing with people who are also troubled but just not in the same immediate dire straits. I hope we don’t stop at this.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply